You would do everything in a difficult financial situation to find a way out. However, people rarely contact a personal injury lawyer when involved in a car accident and must pay for an amounted vehicle, medical expenses, or additional unanticipated expenses. Instead, they fight to make money to survive and get by independently. To know more about why you should hire a Hartford truck accident attorney.
You might know someone like that or fit into that category. Why do individuals not seek legal representation following a vehicle accident? The answers might shock you.
Reasons why people refuse to seek personal injury advice after an accident
Cannot afford the money,
Although personal injury and accident attorneys frequently state to clients that “they will not be paid until you do,” the cost of hiring a lawyer is the primary reason for customers to call one after an accident.
Personal injury attorneys use contingency fees. It also means that, unlike commercial attorneys, criminal defense attorneys, or family lawyers, personal injury attorneys get paid once a case is resolved and the victim is compensated.
Additionally, the amount of compensation that personal injury lawyers can obtain from a court settlement is set by law. In the majority of states, the most percentage that they may earn is 35%, and in most states, it is one-third or 33.3%.
The driver can not afford to pay them
There is an old saying that states that turnips cannot produce blood. Some people think that the driver of the wrecked truck or fifteen-year-old sedan that struck them might not have any extra cash in their pockets. Even if they have insurance, it generally only covers the necessities. The cost of transporting the wreck away is the one that liability insurance will pay.
First, there is no way for you to find out if the defendant is insured. They could not have been telling the truth when they claimed they had no insurance on the scene. This may be a scam to get you to cover your own costs for damages or to prevent you from contacting the police.
They think they are partially at fault.
People often think that if they contributed to the accident in any way, their legal options will be restricted, and they will be unable to recover anything. In fact, they could be required to cover the damages and expenses sustained by the other person. Even worse, their insurance cost can increase, and they might face consequences or legal action.
Courts employ a comparative negligence approach when deciding who could be entitled to financial compensation after an accident and how much they can recover. Comparative negligence involves assessing the event’s details to determine who was most at fault for the harm and loss.